Skip to content
AI Work Index

Community health worker

Compare

AI Exposure Rank

33/100

Low

Range 25–39/100 across source-weight sensitivity checks

Community health worker has an AI Exposure Rank of 33/100, meaning its work is more exposed to current AI capabilities than approximately 33% of Singapore occupations. The evidence currently points to limited direct change; this is a relative rank, not a probability of job loss.

Limited direct change

Associate Professionals & Technicians·SGD 3,103/mo (3,000–4,425)·~1.2K workers in SG·Updated 2026-07-17

Relative AI exposure, not a prediction of job loss. Hiring, wages and role design depend on many forces this rank does not forecast.

Wage 25% below group median Exposure 8pp below group median #87 of 122 in Associate Professionals & Technicians →
01

How This Rank Is Built

The evidence behind this occupation's AI exposure, with human-work and demand context shown separately. How this works

Tasks AI can handle

With 35% AI task overlap (based on Felten AIOE, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou GPT exposure, and ILO occupational exposure), the Community health worker tasks most exposed include: diagnostic pattern recognition, medical literature synthesis, appointment scheduling, patient record summarization, and drug interaction checking.

  • • Maintain updated client records with plans, notes, appropriate forms, or related information.
  • • Advise clients or community groups on issues related to improving general health, such as diet or exercise.
  • • Identify or contact members of high-risk or otherwise targeted groups, such as members of minority populations, low-income populations, or pregnant women.

O*NET tasks for this occupation with the most observed Claude usage (Anthropic task data).

What AI can't do here

At 25% human bottleneck protection, the tasks that remain hardest to automate for Community health worker include: patient examination, clinical judgment under uncertainty, empathetic communication, emergency decision-making, and informed consent processes.

Main insulation channels: High-stakes decisions + Non-routine work — the work-context dimensions behind this occupation's human bottleneck.

Skills to focus on

Clinical ReasoningPatient CommunicationEmergency ResponseEthical Decision-Making

Sources: Felten AIOE (2021), Anthropic Economic Index (2026), Eloundou GPT Exposure (Science, 2024), ILO GenAI (2025), Pizzinelli et al. bottleneck model. Full methodology.

From exposure to employment

What could change the employment outcome?

AI capability is only the starting point. Adoption, task design, human oversight, demand, mobility and evidence quality determine how exposure may resolve in practice.

01

Workplace adoption

Occupation-level adoption unknown

MOM does not publish a directly mappable adoption rate for the listed industries.

02

Task structure

Task evidence limited

100% weighted task match · 0% effective coverage

03

Human advantage

Coordination and judgment still matter

At 25% human bottleneck protection, the tasks that remain hardest to automate for Community health worker include: patient examination, clinical judgment under uncertainty, empathetic communication, emergency decision-making, and informed consent processes.

04

Hiring and demand

3.4% vacancy rate · 2026 Q1

PMET vacancies increased from Q4 and remained below their year-ago level. Hiring stayed net positive but slowed, while retrenchment incidence remained the highest of the three broad occupation groups. In 2025, this broad occupation group had 2.3% time-related underemployment and 8.7% non-permanent employment. Across the published male and female series, CPI-adjusted median income changed -7.7% to -2.1% from 2018 to 2023.

05

Career transitions

Enrolled/Assistant nurse (excluding registered nurse)

moderate modeled transition; outcomes still depend on skills, wages and openings.

06

Evidence strength

medium confidence

4 exposure sources · sensitivity 25–39/100 across source-weight sensitivity checks.

These lenses are reported separately and do not alter AI Exposure Rank. Labour-market figures describe a broad official occupation cluster, not this SSOC occupation alone.

02

Singapore Now

Current labour market conditions and how they affect this role.

Local conditions are under more strain. Vacancies have softened and displacement signals are less forgiving.

Vacancy

3.4%

↓ 2.9% YoY

Hiring

1.2%

vs 0.7% resign

Retrenchment

2.6

per 1,000 · moderate

Re-entry

69.1%

find work in 12mo· +1.4pp

Professionals, Managers, Executives & Technicians · 2026 Q1

Top Industries

Public Administration & Education Services
15%
Wholesale & Retail Trade
13%
Financial & Insurance Services
10%

Industry vacancy overlays use the latest published detailed cross-tab, which can lag the main labour monitor.

03

What You Can Do

Frequently asked questions

Will AI replace Community health worker?

Community health worker has an AI Exposure Rank of 33/100, meaning its work is more exposed to current AI capabilities than approximately 33% of Singapore occupations. The evidence currently points to limited direct change; this is a relative rank, not a probability of job loss. AI Exposure Rank: 33/100 (Low). Median wage: SGD 3,103/month.

What is the AI exposure rank for Community health worker?

Community health worker has an AI Exposure Rank of 33/100, rated Low. It ranks higher than approximately 33% of Singapore occupations for exposure to current AI capabilities; it is not a job-loss probability.

What career transitions are available for Community health worker?

Community health worker has modeled transition pathways to related occupations. The strongest adjacent pathway is Enrolled/Assistant nurse (excluding registered nurse), based on skill and wage similarity (model-estimated). Transition scoring accounts for wage preservation, training ease, and destination quality.

How does Community health worker salary compare in the live market?

Community health worker earns a median gross wage of SGD 3,103/month in the live market (25th-75th percentile: SGD 3,000-4,425). This is 31% below median across all 562 scored occupations, and 25% below group median within Associate Professionals & Technicians occupations.