Skip to content
AI Work Index

Reports

Latest context: 2.9% resident unemployment (2026 1Q) · 1.46 vacancies per unemployed person · 74% of workers using AI at work · Q1 2026 full labour monitor · score release 2026-07-17

Published Reports

Singapore Job Market Evidence Current

Vacancies, entry-level hiring, job quality, real wage movement and occupation-family employment change—kept separate from AI exposure ranks.

V8 Methodology and Public Contract Current

The current release publishes a within-market AI Exposure Rank, separate substitution and augmentation ranks, likely job pathways, demand context, and evidence confidence.

V7 Release Note Archive

Archived documentation for the former V7 demand-adjusted structural score. Its formula and bands are not the current V8 public meanings.

V6 Release Note Archive

V6 introduced the two-axis structural formula with 4-source exposure ensemble, human bottleneck, and explicit demand resilience. Superseded by V7.

V4.3 Shadow Model Note Shadow published

Archived task-weighted shadow comparison retained inside the pre-V8 audit trail. It is not the current public score.

Shadow score is published. Promotion into the headline model still depends on validation and anchor-review sign-off.

V5 Roadmap Archive

Archived roadmap for the V5 research program that preceded the current V8 public contract.

Preserved for auditability alongside the published sidecars and promotion trail.

V5 Model Note Archived live note

Archived promotion note for the former live V5 model, preserved so the V7 release can still be compared against its immediate predecessor and retained adjunct layers.

Current validation snapshot: structural 2/2, realized 2/4. The retained V4.3 baseline and promotion-comparison artifacts remain published.

Wage Exposure Analysis Report

Annual wage context for occupations in the two highest AI exposure bands, with sector breakdowns and explicit limits on what the totals mean.

Based on V8 scoring, updated 2026-07-17

Q4 2024 Scoring Report

Initial V3 scoring results: 562 occupations scored across exposure, bottleneck, and market resilience. Key findings on paradox roles, highest-risk occupations, and theory vs practice gaps.

Archived V3-era report. Its terminology and score definitions are not current V8 meanings.

Governance & Release Notes

Changelog Ledger

Canonical release ledger for structural releases, shadow-model notes, report refreshes, and official labour-monitor updates.

18 recorded events in the current public history

Latest release activity Current

V8 truthful AI exposure release

Published 2026-07-15 · V8

Open →

V7 structural release

Published 2026-04-07 · V7

Open →

V6 structural release

Published 2026-04-01 · V6

Open →

Latest Available Evidence

Latest published or captured observations. Source dates—not file generation dates—determine freshness. These signals remain separate from the structural score.

Firm AI Adoption · 2026

28.5%

firms started adoption · MOM

Workers · 2024

73.8%

using AI at work

Unemployment · 2026 1Q

2.9%

resident unemployment

Labour tightness · 2026 1Q

1.46

vacancies per unemployed person

Employment · 2026 1Q

+9.4K

total employment change

Retrenchments · 2026 1Q

3,830

1.6 per 1,000 employees

Archived postings snapshot (93/562 occupations covered)

Top Skills

Python · Go · Java

AI / Tools

tableau · power bi · chatgpt

Observed through

Mar 20, 2026

Not a current hiring measure

Employer signal archive (11 captured signals)

Highest Pressure

general_professional · software_engineering

high signal tier

Latest Signal

Oct 6, 2025

Archived V7 structural movers (0 band changes, occupations-v7-2026-06.json to occupations-v7-2026-07.json)

Top Risers

No major risers

Top Fallers

No major fallers

Quarterly Briefing

What changed

  • No occupations changed risk band in the latest frozen comparison.
  • Professionals, Managers, Executives & Technicians saw the strongest vacancy pickup while Production & Transport Operators, Cleaners & Labourers saw the sharpest vacancy cooling in the live labour monitor.
  • Structural movers remain limited in the latest snapshot comparison.

Why it matters

  • Clerical, Sales & Service Workers now reads as deteriorating, which means structural pressure is landing on a weaker live labour backdrop for that family of work.
  • Production & Transport Operators, Cleaners & Labourers still reads as strong, so not every high-exposure occupation faces the same near-term labour conditions.

What to watch

  • Watch whether rising retrenchment counts persist into the next quarter rather than treating one quarter as a trend.
  • Watch whether official demand lists change meaningfully in the next release cycle.
  • Read snapshot movers together with the live monitor, not as standalone proof of labour-market deterioration.